Appendix talk:COBOL

Appendix:COBOL
As a common practice, the few languages that may be represented by abbreviations, are instead represented by their full names. Let me mention all or most of them: So, as a natural choice, I propose moving Appendix:COBOL to Appendix:Common Business-Oriented Language, while keeping the former as a redirect. --Daniel. 17:34, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 * We have Category:American Sign Language, not Category:ASL.
 * We have Category:Serbo-Croatian language, not Category:BCS language.
 * We have Appendix:Hyper Text Markup Language, not Appendix:HTML. (the latter is a redirect)
 * We have Appendix:A Programming Language, not Appendix:APL. (the latter is a redirect)
 * Oppose. --Dan Polansky 09:19, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. SemperBlotto 09:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. I question the wisdom of the current names of two of Daniel.'s examples. Why not Appendix:APL (or Appendix: APL (programming language)) and Appendix:HTML as primary names? Not that it matters so much. DCDuring TALK 16:26, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Use whatever is the most common name. Computer languages tend to be referred to as abbreviations more often than not, while I'm not too sure about human languages. —CodeCat 20:48, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Oppose. At first sight, I didn’t even recognize "Appendix:A Programming Language" as being about APL. I say move to Appendix:HTML and Appendix:APL too. —Robin 13:55, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Fails by a large margin. Mglovesfun (talk) 13:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)