Appendix talk:Fiction/Live-action series

RFD discussion: April 2018–February 2020
Doesn't seem useful for us. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 07:50, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Equinox ◑ 08:10, 29 April 2018 (UTC)


 * ( —Suzukaze-c◇◇ 20:55, 10 May 2018 (UTC))


 * Keep. It meets WT:FICTION. My opinion is this: in most or all cases, it's best to have catch-all appendices for terms of fiction like that one than having individual appendices for each universe like Appendix:Star Wars. I see Appendix:Star Trek was deleted after a mere 2-people RFDO, so I moved most (not all) of the terms there to Appendix:Fiction/Live-action series now. (I would have voted "delete" Appendix:Star Trek too, for the reason I just said.)
 * See also this discussion above:, to be archived at Appendix talk:Fiction/Films. Suzukaze-c, thank you for the ping. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 01:54, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * What is "Doesn't seem useful for us" supposed to mean? That's a pretty bad rationale for deletion. This, that and the other (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete, I don't think we should host fiction terms anywhere (unless they've been integrated to the language, in which case they belong in the main space). Per utramque cavernam 12:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
 * : Why not? As I said, the appendix meets WT:FICTION. Other Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia, Wikiquote and apparently Wikibooks (Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter) have pages about works of fiction too. Why should Wiktionary be different? These terms are even in the appendix namespace. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 23:13, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, per Per utramque cavernam. Wiktionary should be different because this is not an encyclopedia. Ultimateria (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The content is so weak too. "A fictional planet, a fictional race, a fictional teleporter..." Yes, media contains fictional things and they have names. Equinox ◑ 15:40, 30 December 2019 (UTC)


 * RFDO-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)