Appendix talk:Hebrew vav-consecutive forms

RFDO discussion: May–September 2016
User:Enoshd tagged this for speedy deletion, but I think it should be kept (and expanded to actually have content). --WikiTiki89 15:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I would support keeping it if it had content but it's been sitting there for five years (minus two days). Might as well be deleted until it someone really creates it with content. Enosh (talk) 15:38, 4 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Deleted, it can always be recreated, but right now it's unprofessional and misleading to link to it. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 00:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)