Appendix talk:Independent Indo-European languages Swadesh lists

Appendix:Independent Indo-European languages Swadesh lists
Ignoring the fact that the title is just weird, don't we already have Swadesh lists for these languages? Mglovesfun (talk) 10:57, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The title follows naming conventions used in other lists at Appendix:Swadesh_lists and there are no lists for those languages yet. Paul Pela 11:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, there's no swadesh list for Ancient Greek. However, all the other languages in there do exist already as independent swadesh lists. -- Prince Kassad 15:55, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I looked further and I found those lists. They are not in the index of Swadesh lists, though. I think it would be good to either add Ancient Greek to Modern Greek list or to make it a separate list. What do you propose? Paul Pela 15:35, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The Swadesh lists are, some of them, listed on the list of Swadesh lists, others not. Some are in the category of Swadesh lists, others not. Some are categorized in "[Languagename] appendices", others IIRC in "[Languagename] language", others in neither. Someone who cares about the Swadesh lists should clean up this situation. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 15:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * If Ancient Greek is the only one we don't already have, strip away the rest and leave just that. BTW what is an "Independent Indo-European language" for heathens like me? Mglovesfun (talk) 15:38, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Move useful information to Appendix:Ancient Greek Swadesh list, delete the rest. "Independent Indo-European languages" are Indo-European languages that have no siblings. Unlike Slavic or Celtic languages there are no “Armenian languages”, just one Armenian. --Vahagn Petrosyan 20:41, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved the list to Appendix:Ancient Greek Swadesh list so now someone with appropriate rights can delete Appendix:Independent Indo-European languages Swadesh lists. Paul Pela 08:58, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Ideally, one day Modern and Ancient Greek Swadesh lists should be merged into one. The purpose of these lists, after all, is determining the distance in genetic relation between sibling languages by comparing them side by side. --Vahagn Petrosyan 14:04, 17 May 2010 (UTC)