Appendix talk:Legal translation dictionaries

Why is this here? Do we really want to spam/promote these non-free dictionaries? --Connel MacKenzie 17:38, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Interesting - in what sense do you mean "non-free"? There's no charge for using them (although they are obviously subject to copyright). I don't think we should have an appendix for them, but they do seem to be useful for at least confirming legal definitions and translations. bd2412 T 17:43, 9 March 2007 (UTC)