Appendix talk:List of dialect-dependent homophones

RFC discussion: February 2007
Spot checking several sections of this, I can't see how any of these assertions are made. As many parts overlap my NY accent, it seems odd that so very much does not correspond. So, do we have a way to label this as "controversial" or "disputed" or something? --Connel MacKenzie 05:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It certainly needs a bit of a clean up. It could also use references.  Though, I'm not 100% sure, Connel, what you mean.  Parts also overlap with my Sydney accent and parts don't.  Is this odd, considering that it's a list of dialect-dependent homophones?  I must be missing something. Jimp 07:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)