Appendix talk:Unsupported titles/Lorem ipsum

Deletion debate
Is a whole passage, not a "term". May be often quoted, but so is Hamlet's soliloquy. Equinox ◑ 20:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * So how would you further subdivide this text into individual terms while still achieving the original definition? I don't think that "consequat" or "exercitation" are words generally used alone to emphasize design over content. --Daniel. 21:01, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I wouldn't put it in a dictionary. I don't think the individual words meet CFI. Equinox ◑ 23:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I think it fits in as an appendix, so that those made-up words can be found when searching Wiktionary. Someone might think that the passage (or a list of words?) is in a real language (it partly is). But move it away from the Unsupported titles section. It shouldn't be a real entry. Wipe 02:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Just delete it. It's certainly not unsupported, whatever it is. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Mg. Note that appendicization is not necessary to find the words, as they're findable already by virtue of being in the page [[lorem ipsum]]. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 16:40, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh, I see why it's at "unsupported titles": because the whole text is so long that it cannot be used as a pagename. But the whole text is not a valid entry title anyway: if anything, each word is, but not even: see talk:tincidunt. &#x200b;—msh210℠ 17:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The words are no longer on the page [[lorem ipsum]]. Also nothing is found when one searches for "consectetur". Wipe 16:38, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete It's already archived at Lorem ipsum, for some reason. —Michael Z. 2010-03-23 19:27 z