Appendix talk:Vulgar Latin in Romance languages

This is a nice list, but it is not written in grammatical English.89.168.178.139 06:51, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: January–February 2015
The description is inaccurate and the whole thing is relatively crappily executed, and probably should have stayed in userspace. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 19:47, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another of a long line of misbegotten, malformed interwikis. It tried to do at Wikipedia what our etymologies and categories do much better, and then it got sent here- where it duplicates what we already have. Chuck Entz (talk) 22:00, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, putting all the Romance languages in a single appendix like this is a hilariously bad idea. Even for individual languages, categorization seems better than an appendix. Renard Migrant (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per Meta and per Chuck. - -sche (discuss) 17:21, 21 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 21:59, 22 February 2015 (UTC)