Appendix talk:X is a beautiful language

Copied from a translation request
See Translation_requests. --Anatoli 13:24, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

RFD discussion: June 2017–February 2024
They are present at the translation section of English is a beautiful language.--2001:DA8:201:3512:BCE6:D095:55F1:36DE 12:18, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Your logic would be flawed if English is a beautiful language is deleted. --WikiTiki89 21:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * So maybe on hold until the discussion of the latter is closed.--115.27.203.95 10:55, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. That RFD failed. I would have preferred to keep the entry, but I'm not comfortable with keeping the appendix either if the entry is unwanted. It makes it seem like the appendix namespace is a space for random trash. Either the phrase is good enough for the dictionary or it's not. --Daniel Carrero (talk) 03:51, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Here is the RFD for anyone who wants to read it. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 23:05, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. --Barytonesis (talk) 14:33, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Please delete per above. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 07:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep, since English is a beautiful language has been deleted. —Mahāgaja · talk 07:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep per Mahāgaja. - excarnateSojourner (talk | contrib) 21:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Appendices are very flexible about what they can have and the entry mentioned above has been deleted. visibility since the entry was deleted after your vote. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 22:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Chuck Entz (talk) 03:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was a silly entry outside the appendix since this hasn't ever come up in any casual conversation I've ever had. What makes this appendix-worthy either? What value does it add? This question doesn't seem to have been answered in any above keep votes. PseudoSkull (talk) 21:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * With due respect, that’s your problem. What if I showed you a YouTube video of a song (in a particular language) and say it is a beautiful language? ·~   dictátor · mundꟾ  14:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * For the phrasebook more than just one song would be needed. I never said the phrase never appeared anywhere, but that it's not nearly commonplace enough for me to consider it worthy of inclusion in a phrasebook, per evidence given in the last RFD. And my point here was, what makes the appendix then a proper place for this? What role does it fulfill for our readers? Who would look this up and why? PseudoSkull (talk) 16:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is a totally random phrase, not idiomatic in any language as far as I can see. It was deleted from the phrasebook, so why should we keep it in the Appendix? There's enough useless junk there, we don't need a proliferation of translations of random phrases. If you want to know how to say that a particular language is beautiful, Google Translate will likely do just fine. This, that and the other (talk) 12:11, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm leaning towards delete, per Pseudoskull and This, that and the other. Doesn't seem to have a lot of value tbh. Acolyte of Ice (talk) 12:17, 30 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep: this should have been in the mainspace as part of the phrasebook. finds the following phrasebooks: 1, 2, 3. This is the phrasebook version of the lemming principle that was rejected at Votes/pl-2018-12/Phrasebook CFI, for reasons not very well articulated, IMHO. I tried  and it discovered the entry, so some might find it and find it useful. Here are |compositional|nontheistic|I_am_thirsty|I_am_hungry page views for the phrase and some other items, all with similar visit rate; it fares better than I am thirsty and I am hungry. So much for objective facts. --Dan Polansky (talk) 13:18, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Graham11 (talk) 07:30, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Aside from whether this is worthy of inclusion, some of these may be word-for-word, grammatically clueless constructions. For example, Lithuanian "lietuviškas kalba yra graža" should be "lietuvių (or much less naturally, lietuviška) kalba yra graži". "graža" isn't even a word or inflection in Lithuanian at all. The Latvian translation means "Latvian-man language is beautiful". Rubbish. 98.170.164.88 07:40, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep as I find it interesting, but it needs checking and cleanup as 98.170 says. - -sche (discuss) 22:02, 30 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Kept per general consensus Denazz (talk) 21:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)