Category talk:Appendix-only constructed languages

RFM discussion: August 2011
I'd like to rename this category to Category:Minor constructed languages.

Rationales: --Daniel 05:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Similarly named categories, such as Category:Appendix-only nouns, are gone. We deprecated this pattern.
 * "Appendix-only" is too technical to appear in the name of the category; "minor constructed language" is all that matters in the first moment.
 * The description of the category already explains that all the languages are "appendix-only", what that means, and why that happens. That description is much better than the short and vague "appendix-only" shoehorned in the title.
 * I created the category in question.


 * But minor is inherently POV, which we should avoid. I wouldn't consider Quenya or Klingon any more "minor" than Novial (which we do include). -- Liliana • 11:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Could any conlang be added?
Is there anything stoping someone from adding a personal conlang or something like that? --67.81.132.165 12:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)