Category talk:Buzzwords by language

RFD discussion: August–November 2023
Supposedly including "terms often rendered meaningless and fashionable through abuse by non-technical persons.". None of the terms in the category could be called "meaningless", and "abuse" is blatantly subjective. Also probably redundant to Category:Corporate jargon by language. Ioaxxere (talk) 16:55, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Looking at the handful of English entries I agree it seems to just mean corporate jargon. —Al-Muqanna المقنع (talk) 17:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The Finnish category is relatively well used here. Any comments from Finnish editors? This, that and the other (talk) 04:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * They can probably all be safely moved to Category:Finnish corporate jargon (which does not exist at the moment). &mdash; S URJECTION / T / C / L / 07:03, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Delete. brittletheories (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Years ago we agreed to delete "jargon" as a gloss on individual definitions. This seems similar. Equinox ◑ 09:33, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * One might delete the category, but not any of the terms. They are widely used. Some, such as, may be used as buzzwords by some (as a lot of words can) but have a well-established meaning. User:Hekaheka

RFD-deleted. I moved most of the non-English entries to the Cat:Corporate jargon by language hierarchy, as they seemed to fit there (thanks for the suggestion ).. Please review and change as needed. The English entries were a random mix of stuff and I mostly removed them from the category without a replacement. This, that and the other (talk) 10:22, 24 November 2023 (UTC)