Category talk:Egyptian reduplicative verbs

RFD discussion: June 2017–July 2018
Was presumably used by some archaic template, but there’re no pages left and it’s not clear what this would be used for. The analogous Category:Latin reduplicative verbs describes itself as containing »verbs that form tenses by reduplicating one or more of its component«, but the overwhelming majority of Egyptian verbs form certain tenses by geminating the final radical, so this wouldn’t be a very helpful usecase, and it would better be named something like Category:Egyptian verbs with geminate root even if it were. There are some Egyptian verbs formed directly by reduplication from shorter words, but that’s a derivational, not an inflectional, process, for which the conventional naming scheme on Wiktionary seems to be ; that doesn’t seem to be what this category was used for anyway. — Vorziblix (talk · contribs) 20:25, 24 June 2017 (UTC)
 * RFDO failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 05:53, 2 July 2018 (UTC)