Category talk:English coordinated pairs

RFM discussion: March–May 2017
These two categories are named confusingly similar, even though they refer to completely different things. I propose that one of the two is renamed so that this confusion is removed. —CodeCat 17:44, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. The "lexical doublets" category isn't about doublets at all, it's about coordinated pairs. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 10:34, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I also agree. Shall we rename it to Category:English coordinated pairs? - -sche (discuss) 18:16, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * That seems like an improvement. —CodeCat 19:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I've made the move, but the entries themselves need to be fixed too. Also, can we find a better parent category than Category:English language? —CodeCat 21:06, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I've moved the entry, and its subcategory to Category:English reduplicated coordinated pairs. - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Pinging since I think I saw them adding entries to this category recently. —CodeCat 21:08, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * So we should also move Category:English lexical triplets, right? Equinox ◑ 03:15, 13 May 2017 (UTC)
 * I suppose so. Which name is better, "coordinated triples" or "coordinated triplets"? - -sche (discuss) 21:05, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅. Moved to "coordinated pairs" and "coordinated triples". - -sche (discuss) 18:30, 18 May 2017 (UTC)