Category talk:English ghost words

For the discussion which led to this category, and some candidate entries and related entries, see as follows
Information_desk/2020/September. - -sche (discuss) 05:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Can someone please add the following link to the page content?
I don't see how to add to the content. It would be good if the following (underlined addition) were added: "English terms that were originally erroneous or fictitious, published in a reference work as if they were genuine as a result of typographical error, misreading, misinterpretation or another process (e.g., see ) ." Quercus solaris (talk) 23:43, 9 April 2021 (UTC)


 * And even more importantly, the page content here should link to the Wiktionary entry for . Quercus solaris (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

dawizard
Maybe dawizard? —DIV (1.145.99.80 13:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC))


 * Yes to the category membership, but the term (an error for "damage" in a certain gamebook, due to replacing mage by wizard) wouldn't meet WT:CFI, I believe. Equinox ◑ 13:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)