Category talk:Entries which need Latin script

The "rfscriptcat" template should be adjusted not to mention transliteration in the case of Latin script.

In case you're wondering how it could be possible for an entry to lack Latin script:

"rfscript" is very often used in etymology sections where a word is listed in the script of the language it was borrowed into but not in its native script.

But something similar also happens. Etymology sections sometimes just state the name of the original language, without either the native script nor a transliteration of it.

But not only this, it can happen that a language with a non-Latin script borrowed a word from a language which does use the Latin script, yet in the etymology section it just states which language the word is from. Thus the page lacks Latin script for the original term.

The term which led me to ressurect this category was a Georgian word which was borrowed from French. But it doesn't say which French word it came from. &mdash; hippietrail (talk) 12:05, 24 October 2012 (UTC)