Category talk:Face

Category:Face
If this category was only meant for terms relating to the human face, should the category be moved to "Category:Human_face" instead? It would be quite confusing if one were to find terms relating to the anatomy of animals, say the face of a dog, and find instead only terms relating to human faces if they were to search through Category:Face. TeleComNasSprVen 00:08, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Add muzzle. --Daniel. 00:13, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. No specific criteria for including entries in the category. DCDuring TALK 03:12, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * For me, the user friendly solution is to have everything in Category:Anatomy. Dividing it up into face, head, feet, arms, legs, whatever won't help users, it will give them more layers to peel through to find things. Delete. --Mglovesfun (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep until a convincing reason for deletion is given. Criteria for inclusion into the category are clear enough: to begin with, parts of human face can be included, as well as facial muscles. Furthermore, the category for anatomy has some 1,600 members, so it is unlikely the user would find there anything just by browsing it. There could be a good reason for deleting the category, but I have not seen it yet. --Dan Polansky 19:20, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Kept: No consensus among 5 people. --Daniel 13:30, 9 July 2011 (UTC)