Category talk:Fictional rodents

Category:Fictional birds
Overly specific. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * How specific is overly specific? Is the discussed category any different from Category:Fictional birds and Category:Fictional people? --Daniel. 18:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * I've now added the former above. Not sure about the latter: it, too, should probably go. (Note that it's a subcat of Fictional characters.) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. These are easily subcategories of fictional animals/creatures. Being specific does not harm the user experience in browsing categories as long as there is navigability. DAVilla 20:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete both. < class="latinx" >Ƿidsiþ 09:04, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, straightforward. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2011 (UTC)