Category talk:Forest products

Only subcategory is 'paper sizes'. It actually looks like a bit of a joke, though I don't think it is. We don't have for example Category:River products for entries such as salmon. Mglovesfun (talk) 19:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * At bgc "forest products" gets 5,400K hits, "river products" gets 10K. "Forest products" is fairly standard characterization of the wood and paper industies, which are not easily separated in practice at the production end. DCDuring TALK 19:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok not heard of it. So, can this be used? We do have Category:Woods, and Category:Paper would be a good parent for Category:Paper sizes, so maybe it is a keep. Any further opinions? Mglovesfun (talk) 21:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I added a few illustrative examples, both new entries and old. DCDuring TALK 22:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Though, you did add them to the wrong category. Mglovesfun (talk) 22:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * We can also add ivory]]. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 23:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete unuseful category. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 23:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't know that there was a utility standard or any other objective standard for topical categories. I just thought that I could get in the playpen with DanielDot, with the same priveleges. DCDuring TALK 00:10, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * @DCDuring, msh210 isn't claiming there is one. Mglovesfun (talk) 09:51, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Right. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:03, 27 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Current content of Category:en:Forest products: delignify, fourdrinier, kraft paper, kraft pulp, lignin, Stihl. Of these, delignify (a verb), fourdrinier (a machine used in making paper), and Stihl (a type of large industrial saw, usually cordless with a petrol motor and a large circular cutting blade) are not forest products. The category was created on 14 August 2010‎ by DCDuring. For a 2010 discussion, see User_talk:DCDuring/2010_QIV. --Dan Polansky (talk) 10:03, 14 July 2012 (UTC)


 * It's all well voting delete, but as nobody has actually deleted it, I declare this as kept. --ElisaVan (talk) 14:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)