Category talk:Form of templates

untitled
For consistency, these templates should call . How? — Vildricianus 14:18, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * No longer applicable. DAVilla 20:31, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Output change
I propose changing the output of these templates to include the word "form", where needed, to improve clarity. – Quoth 08:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)


 * FYI, you'd get more feedback posting this proposal to WT:BP. Rod (A. Smith) 02:24, 30 June 2006 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. I've created the discussion. – Quoth 06:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I've created the template which can be adjusted with css to turn off this difference, for those who prefer it. DAVilla 05:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

RFM
To Category:Form-of templates. I don't see why Category:Form-of templates by language has a hyphen and this doesn't. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I agree, I was going to suggest this myself. But I've been kind of trying to sort out and clean up that category anyway, and one thing I would like to do is to create subcategories for the different types of template. In particular, there would be a category for inflectional form-of templates like and another for alternative forms, spellings and such.  13:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I've created the new category and moved the page contents over, but the templates themselves will need to be fixed by hand. 22:38, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ 23:00, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

As a copy-editing pedant, I’d like to say that you are all awesome. —Michael Z. 2013-05-22 02:39 z