Category talk:Gender and number templates

RFDO discussion: February–April 2014
And all the templates inside. They're all orphaned now, so we can delete them if there are no bots or scripts that still rely on them. 17:31, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * is not orphaned. --kc_kennylau (talk) 17:35, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * It is now. There were only a few transclusions, and I fixed them like this: . It actually passed RFD before, but I'm not sure why, when entries like that one are all it's used for. 19:30, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. --WikiTiki89 07:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * What about and ? They are not in this category, but they are also redundant to . — Keφr 15:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * By the way, above is still not closed. We seem to have a fairly wide agreement to delete it though. — Keφr 15:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Finally. 13:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)