Category talk:Ido verb imperative forms

RFD discussion: April 2019
What is so special about imperative forms in Ido that they alone have a separate category within Category:Ido verb forms? —Rua (mew) 17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
 * In general I don't really see the utility of subcategories of non-lemma forms (except for special cases like Category:Greek dative forms since the modern Greek dative case is a relic that exists only in fixed expressions), so I'm inclined to agree. However, I would also defer to the community of Ido editors. Note that this category is manually added on all 909 pages in the category; if kept, it should be auto-added by . Benwing2 (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree with you on that, subcategorising nonlemmas is pointless. It appears that most of the instances of this category were added by, like in . Maybe he can explain his logic. —Rua (mew) 17:15, 14 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I did a bot run to manually remove the category from the pages and instead set it in . If we want it gone, we then need to remove it from just one place. Benwing2 (talk) 12:10, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Did I do it originally? If so, I had forgotten; more recently, I was creating vocative forms and I had noticed that it seemed to be the norm elsewhere, so I added it. If I was the one who started it, and then I forgot, I have no issue with removing it now. Not sure what my original logic was. Maybe the category already existed, and it seemed like it shouldn't be empty. I don't know. embryomystic (talk) 16:15, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * We did once have this category for other languages, because at one point automatically added it, and you changed that to  in your edit too. But Ido appears to be the only remaining language for which this category still exists. —Rua (mew) 16:30, 17 April 2019 (UTC)