Category talk:Indo-European linguistics

Category:Indo-European linguistics
In all honesty, I don't know what this is. If it were topical, it would be very narrow, and only contains two appendices, I don't think we (generally) allow appendices in topical categories. The two appendices in question are already in perfectly good categories, adding this one serves no purpose, especially as it's an orphan with regard to links. Mglovesfun (talk) 23:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. It certainly has the potential to contain more than it does now, and it can be a useful category for people wanting all the IE linguistics related terms neatly together. Just think of laryngeal: or ablaut:. I think the best thing is to put it in . —CodeCat 23:57, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as too narrow (though I don't know that we don't allow appendices in topical cats). &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Deleted. &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 17:59, 30 November 2010 (UTC)