Category talk:Japanese kanji

This category seems redundant with Category:Kanji. Gwalla 23:38, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
 * But this one seems to be the most appropriate among three candidates according to the current naming convention for categories. I'll try to put them in order... -- Tohru 12:03, 30 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I've been going through the various single-character CJK entries adding Category:Chinese hanzi / Category:Japanese kanji / Category:Hanja, as appropriate. Someone else can start classifying them here by radical, if I don't do it first (probably won't try for a while, so please begin if you're interested). - dcljr 22:09, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Please see Wiktionary talk:Entries on Chinese characters for more discussion along these lines. - dcljr 08:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Navigation header
Hi. I've started a Template:CategoryTOC-radical to mirror the Template:CategoryTOC that's used in Category:English nouns to take care of our large category problem. I can't figure out why plainlinks isn't working tho. Millie 11:53, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nevermind. Fixed. Millie 11:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

RFM discussion: August 2014–January 2015

 * See Category talk:Chinese hanzi.

Adding HSK grade to entries
Just as Kanji entries do, the HSK level of the words' meanings could also be easily added automatically. Apparently, some words do have such a tag (see 不僅). --Backinstadiums (talk) 14:06, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

and 『漢字源』
subtitle: what is a "Japanese kanji dictionary", or "Japanese kanji", anyway? (this is a rhetorical question)


 * https://twitter.com/JUMANJIKYO/status/1073568545013780480
 * https://twitter.com/JPRidgeway/status/1394564879978225671

—Fish bowl (talk) 23:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)