Category talk:Korean hanja nouns

Category:Korean hanja nouns
Since when do we categorize terms by writing system like this? -- Liliana • 01:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete, we don't (though we could if we wanted to). For one thing, Latin script and Han script appear separately in categories, all Han script forms follow Latin script ones. Also wouldn't it be more standard to use ' in Latin script' as opposed to Han tu or hanja? Mglovesfun (talk) 18:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. If someone wanted to propose in the BP to change our standards so that categories like this were allowed, I would not necessarily oppose the change, but for now, our practice is not to have categories like this. - -sche (discuss) 03:23, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

All fail. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:32, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Deleted. Well, all except the last one, so many entries in that it's just like...OH GOD WHY...User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 00:56, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * To quote the documentation at : "In addition, for the hanja forms of Sino-Korean nouns, "hj" should be given as the first parameter: . This will place the entry correctly in Category:Korean hanja nouns" (In cyberspace, no one can hear you scream...). You would want to either: change the template so the first parameter is ignored (quick, but kludgey) or remove the parameter from all the uses of the template, then edit the parameter out of the template (a big task, unless someone offers use of their bot). Chuck Entz (talk) 02:50, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
 * I saw that just now, I've now taken acton to make it similar to other language categories; I replaced it with Category:Korean nouns in Han script by editing the template and documentation. User: PalkiaX50 talk to meh 12:29, 26 July 2012 (UTC)