Category talk:Latin combining forms

In my opinion this category should be reformed to one like ROOT or STEM morpheme. Other combining forms which are not a stem or root should be in one of the affix categories. Paulo Calipari 16:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * In my opinon, there probably shouldn't be anything in this category at all. --EncycloPetey 16:40, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Makes sense. All derived words from, say rex, should refer to rex where the root -reg- is explained in the Etymology section. Paulo Calipari 16:55, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * It shouldn't need to be explained. The form rex: is the lemma, but this word has collapsed an earlier Old Latin stem (as happens with many Latin words).  It is understood that the base form may not match the nominative. --EncycloPetey 17:11, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree, I vote for deletion. Paulo Calipari 18:22, 10 August 2011 (UTC)