Category talk:Portuguese augmentatives

Redundant to Category:Portuguese noun augmentative forms. Putting a "pos=noun" parameter into the template in its 4 members was all that was needed to switch them to the other category.

The alternative to deletion would be to create to make  happy, but these are all nouns, and all augmentatives- so why bother? Chuck Entz (talk) 06:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Unless Category:Portuguese augmentatives were a parent to Category:Portuguese noun augmentative forms. If not, delete it. Mglovesfun (talk) 11:39, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Is an augmentative really a form of a noun in the same way that a plural is a form? I think usually augmentatives and diminutives are nouns in their own right, and may (as in Dutch and German) have different inflection and gender from the base noun. So maybe Category:Portuguese augmentative nouns? 13:10, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * It is also so in Portuguese. In addition, adjectives also have augmentatives, so the RFDed category would be a mess if it contained entries. — Ungoliant (Falai) 13:57, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree, so delete. But should the replacement drop 'forms' from the name? Should I bring this up in WT:RFM so that we can apply it consistently across languages? 14:02, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The kept category gets its name from the poscatboiler subtemplate, so it would seem to apply across languages already (though I haven't checked to see what categories exist in other languages). I would think an rfm might be a good idea- for both the category and the poscatboiler subcategory. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:28, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * On second thought, the poscatboiler subcategory is dependent on the wording used by, so that needs to be considered at the same time. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
 * There are 18 transclusions for, and not all of them are categorizing- but I don't see any parameter explicitly responsible for the difference. Odd. Chuck Entz (talk) 14:45, 19 November 2012 (UTC)