Category talk:Reduplication

Etymology of seesaw

 * Until Revision as of 10:02, 25 June 2009

 Probably a frequentive imitative of rhythmic back-and-forth motion, such as teeter-totter, tic-tac, wigwag, whim-wham, flim-flam, etc., under the umbrella term of reduplication; also likely influenced by the verbs see and saw of either present or past tense.  Probably a frequentative imitative of rhythmic back-and-forth, up-and-down or zigzaging motion, such as teeter-totter, zigzag, flip-flop, ping-pong, etc., under the umbrella term of reduplication; also likely influenced by the verbs see and saw of either present or past tense.
 * Revision as of 11:09, 25 June 2009
 * Revision as of 05:01, 26 June 2009
 * Note: It remains the same as of now.


 * Revision as of 05:58, 26 June 2009
 * Assigned seesaw to the newly created Category:Reduplication. --nemo 06:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

chick flick etc
See: User talk:KYPark --nemo 06:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

cycle
The Proto-Indo-European word = "wheel" (Greek, kyklos = "circle") also has reduplication, likely for onomatopoeia. -- Excerpt from Reduplication

Linguistic mimesis and reduplication are so universal that Greek kyklos could be compared with Korean vi. 구르다 (gureuda), vt. 굴리다 (gullida), and Japanese phrase ころころ ころがる くるま (korokoro korogaru kuruma), meaning "round and round / rolling / wheel, cart, or car," respectively.

English and French cycle and German Zyklus equal to, and stem (via Latin cyclus) from, Greek reduplication kyklos whose sound has more or less varied from tongue to tongue, as well as from dialect to dialect, often to such an extent that some variations no more sound like a reduplication in the phonologic but perhaps morphologic sense, eg, cycle than Zyklus. Is one or both of these examples a reduplication? From the origination perspective, I would say both are! What else would any of you say? --nemo 04:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)