Category talk:Shakespeare quotes

Note: I'm not vouching for this category as a good idea, I'm just moving the content from (bad capitalization). Mglovesfun (talk) 18:23, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Is this really useful? Mglovesfun (talk) 20:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Category:Shakespeare quotes
I don't really see a reason why Shakespearean quotes should be explicitly categorized while many other influential authors are left out. In short, it makes no sense. -- Prince Kassad 19:15, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree: delete. Also, presumably this isn't even being used right: it's categorizing pages using, but I doubt it's categorizing many besides. (Incidentally, [[special:whatlinkshere/template:Shak.]] is essentially a cleanup list: few if any of them use properly formatted citations. (Otoh, that means we shouldn't subst and delete the template just yet: first fix its entries.)) &#x200b;—msh210℠ (talk) 19:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, I'd already considered nominating this for deletion, but I wasn't sure if I'd get enough support. BTW it's also not very well named, Category:Entries with Shakespeare quotes would be much clearer - but delete. Mglovesfun (talk) 12:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I've removed the categorization from, so it can easily now be subst:ed. Per msh210, might be worth removing it slowly (what I call a slow orphaning) in order to clean up the entries as we go. Mglovesfun (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2010 (UTC)