Category talk:ady:Proto-Circassian language

RFDO discussion: August 2014–August 2015
It's not at all clear what this category is supposed to signify. Is it terms derived from Proto-Circassian? Or something else? —CodeCat 18:26, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Adamsa123, what is the purpose of this category? --Vahag (talk) 19:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
 * It is terms derived from Proto-Circassian, but later on I figured it is better simply mentioning those terms in Etymology in each entry rather than creating an entire entry for those terms.--Adamʂa123 (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The correct name for the category is thus Category:Adyghe terms derived from Proto-Circassian, which although it's red does already have some terms in it. However, before it can be properly created, we have to devise a code for Proto-Circassian, which apparently we don't have yet. My suggestion would be  for the Circassian family and   the protolanguage. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:06, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Even so, these should probably be converted from raw categories to a call to in the etymology section. —CodeCat 13:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Of course, but a code for Proto-Circassian is a prerequiste for that too. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 13:42, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Since you are involved with checking languages, can you weigh in on this? —CodeCat 14:08, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Angr is right, the thing to do is assign codes to the Circassian family and Proto-Circassian, and and  and   are fine suggestions. Then we can start using  for this, as you note. - -sche (discuss) 17:44, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * I've created the language and family codes now. —CodeCat 18:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Deleted. --Vahag (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2015 (UTC)