Category talk:en:Leprosy

RFD kept
Excessive category granularity, IMHO. This category has 5 items, and is unlikely to get an interesting number of items. The parent Category:en:Diseases seems to have an okay granularity. --Dan Polansky (talk) 08:34, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * What is an interesting number? 10? 100? 1,000? Could you be more explicit about "okay granularity"? How would one tell whether it was okay with you? DCDuring TALK 12:44, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I would favour keeping such a category. As Leprosy states, "[l]eprosy has affected humanity for thousands of years", with the first textual evidence of the disease dating back to the fourth or fifth millennium BC. Accordingly, it will have accumulated a lot of words in its semantic field (consider the obsolete, for example), not to mention all the words for things involved in the disease's diagnosis, treatment, etc. You can confidently expect Category:en:Leprosy's granularity to improve considerably over time. — I.S.M.E.T.A. 13:47, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. There are some words in the semantic field of leprosy that don’t belong in Category:en:Diseases, like, and . — Ungoliant (falai) 14:07, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * So, do we need to add equivalent categories in other languages? So that words such as could be included in them? SemperBlotto (talk) 14:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I would say so. It's a simple matter of creating, for example, Category:it:Leprosy with the text . — I.S.M.E.T.A. 14:25, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. There are a number of leprosy-related terms in Category:en:Diseases, which is slightly crowded already at 265 entries, and there are quite a few entries in Category:en:Pathology (1463 entries) that belong in Category:en:Diseases, which would make that worse. Add to that the fact that topical categories tend to be under-used, in general, and I suspect that there could easily be a couple dozen in that category with a little work. Chuck Entz (talk) 15:18, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Is "pathology" a topic or a discourse domain? I would have thought that we might need for some terms to be in both a discourse-domain category and one or more topical categories.
 * Don't leprosy and its synonyms belong in a disease category? Where does a causative agent for the disease go? Where would distinct symptoms and treatments go? Where does leper colony (See ) go? DCDuring TALK 15:46, 8 March 2015 (UTC)


 * RFD kept. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 04:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)