Category talk:ine-pro:Body parts

Identical to an existing category
@Rua

This category seems identical in its aim to Category:ine-pro:Anatomy. I suggest that it be replaced by the latter. — J&#8203;as&#8203;p&#8203;e&#8203;t 20:52, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Anatomy is for terms used in the context of anatomy. This category is for terms that refer to body parts. —Rua (mew) 21:00, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Okay then. It's certainly not an intuitive reason for separating the two. Don't you think anatomy should be a subset of body parts?  — J&#8203;as&#8203;p&#8203;e&#8203;t 21:03, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Are all terms related to anatomy also body parts? —Rua (mew) 21:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
 * No, but I do not think that all terms that can be related to anatomy in some way, such as tools for studying anatomy, should be included in some overarching "anatomy" category, especially for something like PIE. However I see you've already sculpted the categories to your liking.  — J&#8203;as&#8203;p&#8203;e&#8203;t 21:07, 22 January 2018 (UTC)