Citations:correus debendi


 * 1668 July 3rd, Sir James Dalrymple of Stair, “Thomas Rue contra Andrew Houſtoun” in The Deciſions of the Lords of Council & Seſſion, in the moſt Important Caſes Debate before them, with the Acts of Sederunt. As alſo, An Alphabetical Compend of the Deciſions; with an Index of the Acts of Sederunt, and the Purſuers and Defenders Names. From June 1661. to July 1681., part 1 (Edinburgh, 1683), pages 547–548
 * Andrew Houſtoun and Adam Muſhet, being Tackſmen of the Excize, did Imploy Thomas Rue to be their Collector, and gave him a Sallary of 30. pound Sterling for a year, thereafter he purſued Andrew Houſtoun upon his promiſe, to give him the like Sallary for the next year, and in abſence obtained him to be holden as confeſt and Decerned: Which being Suſpended, he obtained Proteſtation, and therefore raiſed Caption, and apprehended Andrew Houstoun at Wigtoun, who gave him a Bond of 500. Merks, and got a Diſcharge, and being Charged upon the Bond of 500. Merks, he Suſpends on theſe Reaſons, that Thomas Rue had granted a general Diſcharge to Adam Muſhet, who was his Conjunct, and correus debendi, after the alleadged Service, which Diſcharged Muſhet, and conſequently Houstoun his Partner.


 * 1668 December 19th, Sir James Dalrymple of Stair, “Mr. Alexander Seaton contra Menzies” in The Deciſions of the Lords of Council & Seſſion, in the moſt Important Caſes Debate before them, with the Acts of Sederunt. As alſo, An Alphabetical Compend of the Deciſions; with an Index of the Acts of Sederunt, and the Purſuers and Defenders Names. From June 1661. to July 1681., part 1 (Edinburgh, 1683), page 575
 * Pitmedden purſues Seaton of Menzies as Repreſenting his Father, who was one of the Purſuers Brothers Tutors, for his Fathers Intromiſſion with the Pupils Means, who alleadged Abſolvitor, becauſe the Pupil after his Pupillarity, had granted a Diſcharge to one of the Co-tutors, which did extinguiſh the whole Debt of that Co-tutor, and conſequently of all the reſt, they being all correi debendi, lyable by one individual Obligation, which cannot be Diſcharged as to one, and ſtand as to all the reſt; for albeit pactum de non petendo, may be granted to one, and not be profitable to the reſt, a ſimple Diſcharge, which diſſolveth the Obligation of the Bond, muſt be profitable to all.