Citations:fauxnetic


 * 1997 May 23, "chris calloway" (username), "shows for the big holiday weekend", in, Usenet:
 * my lapdog carnegie spent a quarter million dollars on fauxnetic spelling, but shorthand types inxs of 90 wpm.
 * 2000 April 10, "johnnyapg" (username), "Check your spelling!", in, Usenet:
 * Gosh...they must be using fauxnetic spellings.... :-)
 * 2003 June 11, Mark J. Reed &lt;markjreed@mail.com>, "Re: pronounciation of 'scientia'", message-ID &lt;20030611171908.GB1050@mulan.thereeds.org>, alt.language.latin, Usenet:
 * A schwa is really any of several allophonic lax, indistinct vowels, often written "uh" in fauxnetic English; it is similar to an unstressed version of "uh" in most contexts (closer to "ih" in others), but still distinct from it.
 * 2009 August 16, "Flying Tortoise" (username), "ACC 251 - Fauxnetics - The result", in, Usenet:
 * The fauxnetic is functional but uninspiring. [...] Nice fauxnetics (and sage advice) but I don't see any way to make 'those who are adjective X' a synonym/definition of 'adjective X'.