Citations:heresiac


 * errors for 
 * post 1875, John O’Hanlon, Lives of the Irish Saints: With Special Festivals, and the Commemorations of Holy Persons, Compiled from Calenders, Martyrologies, and Various Sources, Relating to the Ancient Church History of Ireland, volume IV, James Duffy, page 133:
 * Among others, the illustrious St. Athanasius, who had been chosen for the bishopric of Alexandria, in 326, opposed with great zeal and eloquence the heresiac Arius, and his confederates.
 * 1975,, Paris and its Provinces 1792–1802, : , ISBN 0192121952, chapter IV: “Paris and Versailles: The Politics of Mistrust 1793–1798”, § vi: ‘The Geography of Mistrust’, pages 133–134:
 * It would thus seem that the unfortunate authorities of these villages could not win either way, that they must always be in the wrong in the demanding eyes of Parisian orthodoxy and vigilance. If they did not take the trouble to celebrate the Feast of the Supreme Being, this would be taken as proof of indifference. If they did take the trouble to celebrate it, albeit rather late in the day — but the orthodoxy of the perimeter necessarily drags two or three weeks behind that of the capital — and, if, in order to make the normally rather dreary occasion slightly more appetising, they enlisted the participation of a few pretty girls, shapely déesses, no doubt sparsely dressed in this hot month, they were teetering, perhaps without knowing it, on the brink of a néo-hébertiste heresy (for, in year II conditions, the heresy could always survive the heresiac).
 * 1990 July,, Paragraphs on Translation, Multilingual Matters Ltd (1993), ISBN 1853591920 (hardback), ISBN 1853591912 (paperback), chapter VIII, § ix: “The Unfindable Word” (page 53):
 * Jakob Frank appears in the EB (Encyclopaedia Britannica) and the invaluable Petit Robert 2 as an 18th Century Polish Jewish heresiac.


 * 1972,, What Entropy Means to Me, SF Gateway (2012 e-book edition), ISBN 9780575124967, part III: “What Fairer Soul E’er Dwelt This Mortal Cell”, chapter ix: ‘A Moral Dilemma’ (page № unknown):
 * Sabt scowls. “Tere is the arch-heresiac. He is beyond redemption and, thus, beyond the power of Ateichál’s cleansing service. In demanding the good favor of Dore, he demands that Dore’s humanity be dominant over his godhead, a concept unique in its absurdity. He suggests that Dore’s identity with Our Parents goes no further than a ‘willing accord’ with their designs. There is nothing salvageable from his apostasy, and no castigation could be equal to his effrontery.”
 * Sabt scowls. “Tere is the arch-heresiac. He is beyond redemption and, thus, beyond the power of Ateichál’s cleansing service. In demanding the good favor of Dore, he demands that Dore’s humanity be dominant over his godhead, a concept unique in its absurdity. He suggests that Dore’s identity with Our Parents goes no further than a ‘willing accord’ with their designs. There is nothing salvageable from his apostasy, and no castigation could be equal to his effrontery.”