Citations:neurosexism

Noun: "(neologism) the use of neuroscientific research to support preexisting ideas about inherent sex differences"

 * 2010, Cordelia Fine, Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference, W. W. Norton (2010), ISBN 9780393068382, page xxviii:
 * Neurosexism reflects and reinforces cultural beliefs about gender—and it may do so in a particularly powerful way. Dubious “brain facts” about the sexes become part of the cultural lore.
 * 2011, Jan Slaby & Suparna Choudhury, "Proposal for a Critical Neuroscience", in Critical Neuroscience: A Handbook of the Social and Cultural Contexts of Neuroscience (eds. Suparna Choudhury & Jan Slaby), John Wiley & Sons (2011), ISBN 9781444333282, unnumbered page:
 * Critical neuroscience aims to function as an informed voice opposing those distorted images. lmportantly, Fine's critique of neurosexism mentioned earlier is made particularly strong by her close engagement with the experimental design and statistics as well as her skill to write compellingly for a broader audience.
 * 2012, Isabelle Dussauge & Anelis Kaiser, "Neuroscience and Sex/Gender", Neuroethics, Volume 5, Issue 3, December 2012, pages 211-212:
 * Not least, neuroGenderings explored the workings of neurosexism without dismissing neuroscience altogether. Neurosexism is a term launched by psychologist Cordelia Fine, and it stands for the (mis)use of neuroscientific facts and factoids to assert that women and men are categorically different by virtue of their brains, or to simply rehash available sex/gender stereotypes with the vocabulary of the brain.