Citations:technosalvation


 * 2011, Robert Gifford, The Dragons of Inaction, American Psychologist 66(4):290-302:
 * Social comparison probably is related to social risk. Mistrust must often underlie denial. Technosalvation might well presuppose perceived program inadequacy.


 * 2012, James W. Haag, Gregory R. Peterson, Michael L. Spezio, The Routledge Companion to Religion and Science, Routledge (ISBN 9781136634178), page :
 * First disseminated through science fiction, these promises of transhumanist technosalvation have become the principal public narratives surrounding brain-machine interfaces.


 * 2018, Susan Clayton, Christie Manning, Psychology and Climate Change, Academic Press (ISBN 9780128131312), page :
 * In terms of the barriers taxonomy initially presented by Gifford (2011), this category encompasses mistrust, denial, reactance, technosalvation, suprahuman control, lack of self-efficacy, system justification, optimism bias, and confirmation bias.


 * 2019, Elina Närvänen, Nina Mesiranta, Malla Mattila, Anna Heikkinen, Food Waste Management: Solving the Wicked Problem, Springer Nature (ISBN 9783030205614), page :
 * The reliance upon “technosalvation” is a form of cognitive dissonance, allowing us to continue with the status quo while avoiding personal responsibility (Gifford  2011; Lorenzoni et al. 2007).