Module talk:category tree/poscatboiler/data/non-lemma forms

Plurals and noun plural forms
labels["plurals"] = { description = " nouns that are inflected to be quantified as more than one (more than two in some languages with dual number).", fundamental = "Non-lemma forms subcategories by language", parents = {"noun forms"}, }

labels["noun plural forms"] = { description = " nouns that are inflected to be quantified as more than one (more than two in some languages with dual number).", fundamental = "Non-lemma forms subcategories by language", parents = , } Both of these have the same description and are used basically for the same purpose. I think we should either change plurals to be more general ( terms that are...) and move it out of noun forms, or just remove it. I originally came here looking for the duals equivalent of plurals and discovered that noun dual forms and others already existed, so, I think that we shouldn't switch to a scheme similar to plurals because noun * forms already have it all. Enosh (talk) 14:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree. —CodeCat 15:34, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * So, should I delete  or what? Enosh (talk) 16:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * That would just break all the existing "plurals" categories. Those need to be empty first. But have you discussed this with other editors? —CodeCat 18:00, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I haven't, should this be discussed in WT:BP? Enosh (talk) 18:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd say so, yes. —CodeCat 18:22, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

Paucal forms
Paucal forms should be added as well. فين أخاي (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)