Module talk:languages/data/3/b

Missing ancestor for Baluchi
Baluchi (bal) should have the attribute line

Right now, the system claims Proto-Iranian is not an ancestor of Baluchi.

128.84.126.40 07:40, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Added. --Vahag (talk) 08:50, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Request Change for bto
Can we change "bto" from "Iriga Bicolano" to "Rinconada Bikol"? Ethnologue and SIL labels bto as that. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 13:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

bla
Please add "Cans" to the list of Blackfoot scripts /mof.va.nes/ (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. — Eru·tuon 23:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

bfz Mahasu Pahari language
Kindly add Takri as one of the script for the language. Nik9hil (talk) 12:07, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

bhd Bhadrawahi language
Kindly add Takri as one of the script for the language. The region has a history of writing in Takri in its temples, etc. Nik9hil (talk) 11:19, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Bikol Central Baybayin, accents and sortkey
m["bcl"] = { "Bikol Central", 33284,	"phi", "Latn, Tglg", translit = {Tglg = "bcl-translit"}, override_translit = true, entry_name = {Latn = {remove_diacritics = c.grave .. c.acute .. c.circ}}, standardChars = { Latn = "AaBbKkDdEeGgHhIiLlMmNnOoPpRrSsTtUuWwYy", c.punc },	sort_key = { Latn = "tl-sortkey" }, }

add support for Baybayin (or Basahan) as script for Bikol Central in addition to Latin. Also adds sortkey to treat Ñ and NG as separate letters and automatic stripping of accents when accented Bikol Central is provided (as Bikol Central is generally not written with diacritics save tilde in Ñ which occurs mostly in proper nouns). TagaSanPedroAko (talk) 02:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Classical Mongolian is not the ancestor of Buryat
Classical Mongolian had been once adopted as a written lingua franca by eastern Buryats. Although spelled with localised orthographic characteristics, this written language still followed its original Mongolian-proper grammatical/phonological rules, e.g. loss of nominative Middle Mongol -n ( but   ‘gold’), or -dugar rather than -daki as the ordinal marking. Buryat, especially the standard Khori dialect, which is phonetically closer to Mongolian proper, still shares more grammatical similarities with Kalmyk/Oirat. LibCae (talk) 12:40, 9 December 2023 (UTC)


 * At this point, is Classical Mongolian even an ancestor to any living language? Nominkhana arslang (talk) 19:54, 9 December 2023 (UTC)
 * @Nominkhana arslang Mongolian proper, possibly even Khamnigan. A point I was trying to explain is, some basic morphological features of living Buryat are obviously too ancient, compared to Classical Mongolian. Not every Mongolic dialect has such features.
 * “Oiratic”: *usun (according to Дөрвн Өөрдин түүк the Buryats were once a member of the Four Oirats)
 * (loss of oblique *-n: osi(g), osd, osi, oses, oser, osti, osche, osete)
 * LibCae (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * “Oiratic”: *usun (according to Дөрвн Өөрдин түүк the Buryats were once a member of the Four Oirats)
 * (loss of oblique *-n: osi(g), osd, osi, oses, oser, osti, osche, osete)
 * LibCae (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * “Oiratic”: *usun (according to Дөрвн Өөрдин түүк the Buryats were once a member of the Four Oirats)
 * (loss of oblique *-n: osi(g), osd, osi, oses, oser, osti, osche, osete)
 * LibCae (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * (loss of oblique *-n: osi(g), osd, osi, oses, oser, osti, osche, osete)
 * LibCae (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * LibCae (talk) 08:23, 21 December 2023 (UTC)