Module talk:ne-IPA/testcases

This syllabification seems totally wrong to me for some of them. The rest of it seems good to me. —AryamanA (मुझसे बात करें • योगदान) 18:26, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
 * There are some that perhaps you are trying to represent weakened schwas in:
 * ʌt̪ɾʌ should be ʌt̪.ɾʌ
 * t͡sʌ.ɾit̪ɾʌ should be t͡sʌ.ɾit̪.ɾʌ
 * ɾʌt͡sʌ.na should be ɾʌ.t͡sʌ.na
 * For the above, are these schwa dropped or weakened, or what exactly? For example, hi-IPA transcribed चरित्र as /t͡ʃə.ɾɪt̪.ɾᵊ/ because the schwa is very weak. Is it like that? In that case I think t͡sʌ.ɾit̪.ɾᶺ would be the correct transcription.
 * The geminate is handled incorrectly, it should straddle the syllable boundary
 * sʌmː.ʌ should be sʌm.mʌ
 * t͡sʌpː.ʌl should be t͡sʌp.pʌl
 * pʌkː.a should be pʌk.ka