Module talk:och-pron

Baxter-Sagart formatting
It seems like the Baxter-Sagart data includes remarks that probably shouldn't be included within the IPA  marks, such as at 居. —suzukaze (t・c) 00:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Fixed now. Wyang (talk) 09:30, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

Problems at 見, 濟, etc.
The Baxter-Sagert and Zhengzhang reconstructions sometimes have different numbers of readings. This becomes a problem at a few entries, like the second pronunciation of 見 and the pronunciations of 濟. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 19:01, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Justin. Sorry for the late reply. As you saw at 見, the different OC readings can be called as BS,ZS, each consisting of reading numbers separated by +. Also possible in multicharacter words, e.g. 中國. Wyang (talk) 02:44, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * : Thanks! I've updated the description at . See if there's anything to change since I think it's a bit confusing right now. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 05:10, 24 August 2016 (UTC)