Module talk:zh/data/dial-syn/照相

Hokkien
Do you think it's still worth differentiating 像 and 相? --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 09:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The tones are technically different for Xiamen and Zhangzhou, but it's indistinguishable in Quanzhou. In Taiwan, it seems like a mix of the two as well. For Xiamen and Zhangzhou, I think it's worth differentiating. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:11, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * How about overall? Like if the tone is 陽去, we use 相. If the tone is 陰去 or 陰上, we use 像. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 09:12, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Oops, I think I made a mistake. They're basically distinguishable in all dialects. You also made a mistake (I think): it should be 陰去 = 相 and 陽去/陽上 = 像. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 09:15, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, 陰去 = 相 and 陽去/陽上 = 像. --Mar vin kaiser (talk) 09:19, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

耗小影
In 潮普雙言語詞典, 耗小影=照人像, not any photo. Should we remove it? RcAlex36 (talk) 06:44, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it's okay to keep. (That's why I put it in in the first place.) It's the same conflation we have with 相片 and 照片. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:47, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * 相片 and 照片 are synonymous in Mandarin right? Should we indicate 耗小影 means only taking portraits? RcAlex36 (talk) 06:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Supposedly 相片 is 人的照片 according to Xiandai Hanyu Guifan Cidian, so it's the same kind of conflation. I'm not sure if this distinction is particular to Jieyang, since 潮州话1月通 (p. 105) just says 照相 for ho3 小影 (though 小影 is glossed as 相片). — justin(r)leung { (t...) 07:02, 30 November 2020 (UTC)