Module talk:zh/data/ltc-pron/耍

Not in Guangyun
, this isn't found in Guangyun or Jiyun. Kangxi cites 篇海 (沙下切), while Hanyu Da Zidian and Wang Li's Gu Hanyu Zidian cites 字彙 (沙雅切). What should we do about this? — justin(r)leung { (t...) 03:51, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I think this should be deleted, since it is not in Guangyun. Wyang (talk) 05:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I agree. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:45, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

RFDO discussion: March 2017
耍 is not found in Guangyun, so there should be no Middle Chinese data. — justin(r)leung { (t...) 06:47, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedied. In future,, just mark this kind of thing with once you guys are in agreement. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:50, 3 March 2017 (UTC)