Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/xodъ

Etymology
According to, from , from. Cognate with 🇨🇬.
 * Accent paradigm c:

believes that the comparison is “tempting, but unfounded phonetically,” which does not contradict the analogy in any way: The form has initial by analogy with derived words beginning with the prefixes, , , in which  shifted to  by the. But contradicts the.

According to, the form is borrowed from (Dybo 2002: 479).

believes that the hypothesis of borrowing from Iranian is “semantically implausible” and the form goes back to (Kortlandt 2007: 1). However, according to Nikolaev, it is accentologically implausible. According to ESSJa, reverse derivation is impossible, which supports the accentological argument.

Some dialect groups make it possible to reconstruct the semantic-accentuation pair:,  and ,. For example, this semantic-accentuation pair is represented in the Posozhko-Pripyat dialect: xod, xódu,  xódom ~ xod,  xodá,  xodóm. Most other dialects usually retain one variant of the semantic-accentuation pair.
 * Accent paradigm b:

According to Nikolaev, the form is a secondary deverbative of (Nikolaev 2012: 98).

Noun

 * 1) motion, movement
 * 2) passage, place of moving forward

Descendants

 * East Slavic:
 * South Slavic:
 * : xọ̑d
 * : xu̯ȏt
 * Old Slovene: hod
 * : xȗət
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * : xọ̑d
 * : xu̯ȏt
 * Old Slovene: hod
 * : xȗət
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * Old Slovene: hod
 * : xȗət
 * West Slavic:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian:
 * Sorbian: