Reconstruction talk:Coptic/ϫⲉⲣϫⲏ

RFD discussion: December 2020–March 2021

 * Marked as reconstructed, but appears to be absent from the references listed in the entry, and it has no descendants. Upon what basis should this even be reconstructed? —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:32, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The author said “the Bohairic form can be reconstructed quite confidently based on toponymy and cognate words”. In the original state of the page, and still after I enquired the author, it was unclear whether this is even supposed to be a reconstruction or a term attested somehow. Anyhow, if we aren’t told how it is attested then we have to delete it. Interesting though what’s with the Lycopolitan page and the Sahidic form given. It is all so specific that one should think there is something behind it. But also it is kinda not our job to solve such riddles. Fay Freak (talk) 16:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * RFD-deleted. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 09:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)