Reconstruction talk:Gothic/𐌲𐌰𐌹𐍃𐌰𐌻𐌰𐌹𐌺𐍃

Reconstruction:Gothic/𐍅𐌿𐌻𐍆𐌹𐌻𐌰
No descendants. —Rua (mew) 10:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)


 * I see the second RFD-nomination has already been retracted. [...]
 * Reconstruction:Gothic/𐍃𐍅𐌹𐌽𐌸𐌹𐌻𐌰 - The 'descendants' were listed at usage notes, something you might have fixed yourself instead of going through the effort of RFD-nomming the entry. I have fixed the entry to include a 'descendants' header, so keep.
 * Reconstruction:Gothic/𐍅𐌿𐌻𐍆𐌹𐌻𐌰 - The 'descendants' were listed at usage notes, something you might have fixed yourself instead of going through the effort of RFD-nomming the entry. I have fixed the entry to include a 'descendants' header, so keep.
 * In the case of those last two names the basis for their Gothic reconstruction was blindingly obvious from the entry already, so I am not sure why you nominated them at all (assuming you read the entries). That is, unless you nominated them to make a point about the formatting, in which case there are better ways to go about doing that. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 10:29, 8 April 2019 (UTC)