Reconstruction talk:Gothic/𐌸𐌻𐌹𐌿𐌲𐌰𐌽

RFD discussion: September–November 2018
Neither attested directly nor indirectly through derivations, transliterations, borrowings or any of the other usual reasons to add a reconstruction. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 17:58, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Move to WT:RFVN to ask if anybody has any other sources, references? -20:41, 1 October 2018 (UTC)


 * I never am sure whether RFV is also supposed to be for reconstructed entries. But anyway this one for sure isn't attested, and I can't really find it elsewhere as a reconstruction either. — Mnemosientje (t · c) 11:47, 5 October 2018 (UTC)


 * RFDO failed. Ultimately no reason to believe it to have existed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:06, 5 November 2018 (UTC)