Reconstruction talk:Latin/aramen

Attested?
According to https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/386640 (page 273), the form with a- instead of ae- is attested in the ninth century, and possibly the sixth. The exact form cited may either be aramen, aramum, araminum, or aramentum. Kwékwlos (talk) 02:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes, the source isn't very clear. It would be nice to have a more detailed description than a footnote. If the specific form aramen is attested in either century, that would change things. Nicodene (talk) 02:52, 27 May 2023 (UTC)