Reconstruction talk:Old Median/ganǰam

Middle Persian spelling
gnc is probably the Book Pahlavi spelling, and gnz is the Manichaean spelling, not the other way around, please check this. --Z 08:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Median form should be *ganzam and Middle Median *ganǰ. Compare Old Persian a Median loanword.--Calak (talk) 15:01, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * It makes more sense that OP borrowed OM ǰ as a z than PIr ǰ > OM z > MM ǰ. --Victar (talk) 16:27, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I didn't understand. Do you speak about PIr *ǰ or *ĵ? I think you are talking about PIr *ĵ /dz/.--Calak (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * For a comparison of PIr ĵ > OM z, see . --Victar (talk) 20:14, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Now can you tell me PIr form of Median *ganǰam?--Calak (talk) 13:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Possible borrowing from Chinese
Wild guess, but could this be ? Presumably this would have to be borrowed via trade contacts in this case, not sure if the historical record here makes this derivation feasible. Is there a plausible historical route for this word to enter Median and not other Iranic languages? The hypothetical timeframe also seems to be rather narrow, based on how the 子 in 金子 is read with to-on, as opposed to kan-on, in Japanese. The vowel mismatch seems problematic, though. Agamemenon (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

scripts for Khwarezmian and Sogdian
Sogdian and Khwarezmian cognates have γ (gamma), not y. See for example p. 83 in W. Henning, "A List of Middle-Persian and Parthian Words", BSOAS 9, no. 1 (1937), and p. 297 in Martin Schwartz "On the vocabulary of the Khwarezmian "Muqaddimatu l-Adab", as edited by J. Benzing", ZDMG 120, No. 2 (1970). I will correct these two fundamental errors after posting this discussion topic. But can't edit the scripts on my phone at the moment. Someone else should add in the form in the actual scripts if they are capabable. So putting this reminder here. Mardinli Deli (talk) 04:17, 15 June 2024 (UTC)