Reconstruction talk:Primitive Irish/ᚔᚅᚓᚊᚐᚄ

RFDO discussion: April–September 2017
Is there any good reason to believe that this exact form existed? If not, we don't need this entry. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:53, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Reconstruction:Primitive Irish/ᚃᚓᚏᚐᚄ
Same as above. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 06:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, they're in the Reconstruction namespace, so they don't need to be attested, they just need to have descendants, which they do. So technically there's no grounds for deletion, but I do agree they're kind of pointless, especially written in Ogham. We can just list the Proto-Celtic words in the etymology sections of the descendants. But if we are going to have reconstructed Primitive Irish, I'd rather have it in Latin letters. So I'd either delete or move to Reconstruction:Primitive Irish/enekʷas (no idea why the page creator thought it started with i) and Reconstruction:Primitive Irish/weras respectively. —Aɴɢʀ (talk) 07:11, 8 April 2017 (UTC)


 * RFDO failed. —Μετάknowledge discuss/deeds 01:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)