Reconstruction talk:Proto-Balto-Slavic/ō

*ō
User:Rua Don't you think that the should have given the  > ? Since Winter's law does not apply before aspirated consonants. Here we see a voiced stop. However, there is no phonation that is like a creaky voice or. In doing so, we would get a different reflex in Lithuanian… without phonation gives. Here it is possible to reconstruct only without phonation, which would give. And consider it a Balto-Slavic feature. Gnosandes (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The neuter pronoun *tod > *ta has no evidence of Winter's law either. That suggests that the loss of the consonant preceded Winter's law. —Rua (mew) 22:08, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
 * User:Rua Perhaps also by evidence of the ending of the o-stem abl.sg. But the Lithuanian reflex should have been different. I do not support this unsubstantiated hypothesis about . Gnosandes (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)